Why don’t maple leaves act like craig berube group? – Hockey writers – toronto maple leaves

After 16 games, the questions surrounding the Toronto Maple Leafs began to bubble up. The team can score with anyone in the league, yet they offer shooting as a light-feeder. Specifically, Toronto ranks fifth in the Eastern Conference with 59 goals scored in 16 games, strong, but their goal difference is not good (-1). That has already been shown in structural or defensive problems despite the talcs.

Related: Hurricanes beat Maple Leafs 5-4 to seek 4th straight win.

This team has lost two at home, has been outscored 85-46 over the stretch, and somehow seems less organized now than ever. Against the Carolina Hurricanes on Sunday night, they looked unprepared. Dennis Hilles Hilledy faced more unusual papers than most goalies face in the month.

It’s strange that I find myself thinking this, but when all the maple leafing devices seem to be missing at the same time, it’s worth asking: This teaching problem?

A program without maple leaves

When Craig Berube arrived, the promise was a structure – hard slots, hard forechecks, and no free rides. Instead, maple leaves look confused at their ends. Cracks die on the walls, passes two meters, and strong hands like Chris Tanev (the absence of a list that does not help Chris Tanev (Jake McCabe’s) turn to blind chews to survive the opposing pressure.

You don’t see six-pack defensemen who forget how to play the position all night long. What you see is a program that did not catch on. Or, perhaps, even worse: perhaps a program that consumers don’t buy.

The second time tells this story. This is where good teams lock things down. Toronto runs out of the rink. For his lack of people skills, Chiefs head coach Mike Bandcock was a strong writer. I have accepted that the second season showed what the team was. Specifically, he noted: “Good teams always beat the other team in the second period.” If so, the maple leaves are not that big this season.

Related: Do maple leaves make their grits sustainable?

Currently, the loss of the second period shows the maple leaves that have a compass. Opponents stretch out, take out the breaks, and use every shift in the offensive zone while Beribe slashes his arms and defies frustration allowances.

Berube’s message, or lack of it

Beribe’s reputation was built on reaction and bite. He was a coach who would not allow anyone to coast. But watch the bench now. Auston Matthews flows through the trip, misses back, and still gets his 21 minutes. Morgan Rielly turns the puck over; Nothing changes. One could suggest that old traditions have swallowed up the second bench manager.

But that fits the problem in something, I believe, more complicated. As a head coach, he can shout all he wants, but when what happens on the ice doesn’t change, the message dies in translation. Maybe the players don’t get it completely, but they sure don’t look inspired. Any fame Berube brought from his continuation and debut with St. Louis Blues are not held in Toronto. The maple leaves are still playing as a team waiting for someone else to take the lead.

Related: Patrick Marleau’s perpetual maple leap leap leap

You can’t fault their effort. They seem to care. It’s a lot they’re not ready for. I no longer know what “berube hockey” looks like. It’s like that old montthon drawing about a 100-meter dash for riders with no sense of direction.

Some bright spots in the maple leafts’ current chaos

There is, of course, another flash of glamor. William Nylander has been spectacular. He has been the team’s best player all season. His two goals against the Hurricanes last night were reminders of just how much of a talent he (and the roster) is.

Bobby Mcmann showed some backbone by jumping on a co-worker. And, as noted, Hilleby Young gave them strong leverage in what seemed like an impossible situation. The first time last night they were electric, and the team led 3-2. In the end it looked like the maple leaves we all expected to see under Beribe – Fast, Confident, and Hungry.

But this season, those good times don’t last. In the third period, the Maple Leafs were out 21-2. That cannot be exhausted; that systematic fall. Carolina did not work; They were playing with them. The storm system is repeating itself. Toronto still looks like a collection of great ideas that never connected. The group had no answer when pressed.

HOCKEY commentators are missing the point with these maple letters

It might be wrong to hang everything on Beribe this soon. HOCKEY commentators seem to be pointing fingers at the maple leafts’ top players for being somehow “entitled.” But the argument isn’t that the top players aren’t consistent – they’ve mostly done their part.

Matthews has done exactly that – nine goals in 16 games and a driving performance in heavy minutes. However, there is a desire for him to focus on the point-a-game pace. That’s not a mistake so much as a sign of how the offense still deals with individual skills rather than combined play. NYLANDER (23 points in 13 games) continues to lead the offense, John Tavares (21 points in 16 games) is consistent, and Matthew Knees (20 points) is more than keeping pace.

Related: NHL morning recap – November 10, 2025

The top players are important enough to manage their game; They don’t need much training to produce. It’s the rest of the lineup – Berube should be able to reach – that hasn’t shown the same clarity or edge.

Big question for maple leaves

That’s where the real concern lies, down the line. This is where identity comes in: Formation, repetitive practice, and reinforced habits. It’s just not like that. This is where Beribe’s training should be most important. The bottom six are not short on effort, but they are short on clarity. They need a defined (and well-executed) system of dependence – visible routes, easy exits, a clear sense of who you are.

Despite that frame, the maple leafs’ deep players look like they’re chasing the game rather than shaping.